Food Industry Deception
The sugar industry paid Harvard scientists to blame fat for heart disease. The food industry has systematically manipulated nutrition science, regulatory policy, and dietary guidelines for decades.
In the 1960s, the sugar industry paid Harvard scientists to publish research blaming fat for heart disease — and it worked. Decades of dietary policy were built on bought science. The food industry still funds its own safety reviews, the FDA lets companies self-certify additives as safe, and 60% of the American diet is now ultra-processed food linked to cancer, diabetes, and depression.
Overview
In 2016, researchers at UCSF discovered documents showing that the Sugar Research Foundation (now the Sugar Association) paid Harvard scientists in the 1960s to publish a review blaming dietary fat — not sugar — for heart disease. The payments, equivalent to $50,000 today, were never disclosed. The resulting publication in the New England Journal of Medicine shaped decades of dietary policy, contributing to the low-fat craze that replaced fat with sugar in processed foods.
This was not an isolated incident. Internal documents from food companies reveal systematic efforts to manipulate nutrition science, fund favorable research, and influence dietary guidelines. Coca-Cola funded the Global Energy Balance Network to promote the idea that lack of exercise — not diet — was the primary driver of obesity. When this was exposed by the New York Times in 2015, the organization dissolved.
The FDA's "Generally Recognized as Safe" (GRAS) system allows food companies to self-certify the safety of additives without FDA review. A 2014 study found that of nearly 1,000 GRAS notifications, the vast majority were made by parties with financial conflicts of interest. The US permits thousands of food additives that are banned in the EU, including several artificial dyes linked to behavioral issues in children.
Ultra-processed foods now constitute approximately 60% of calories consumed in the American diet. Research published in the BMJ and other major journals has linked ultra-processed food consumption to increased risks of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and depression. The food industry's response has mirrored the tobacco industry playbook: fund doubt, attack unfavorable research, and lobby against regulation.
"The sugar industry paid three Harvard scientists the equivalent of $50,000 to publish a review that shifted the blame for heart disease from sugar to fat. The resulting paper shaped dietary policy for decades." — JAMA Internal Medicine, 2016
Timeline
Sugar Industry Pays Harvard
Sugar Research Foundation pays Harvard scientists to publish review blaming fat, not sugar, for heart disease.
UCSF Industry Documents Library
Coca-Cola Funding Exposed
NYT reveals Coca-Cola funded researchers to downplay the link between sugary drinks and obesity.
New York Times investigation
Sugar Papers Published
JAMA Internal Medicine publishes UCSF analysis of sugar industry documents from the 1960s.
JAMA Internal Medicine
FDA Bans Red Dye No. 3
FDA revokes authorization for Red Dye No. 3 after decades of evidence linking it to cancer in animals.
FDA announcement
Key Players
Cristin Kearns
Discovered the sugar industry documents at Harvard showing industry payments to manipulate nutrition science.
Marion Nestle
Author and researcher who has extensively documented food industry influence on nutrition science and policy.
The GRAS Loophole
The FDA's "Generally Recognized as Safe" designation was created in 1958 to exempt common ingredients like vinegar and salt from the formal food additive approval process. Over decades, the system has been exploited to allow companies to self-certify the safety of novel additives with little to no independent oversight.
A 2014 study in JAMA Internal Medicine found that financial conflicts of interest were present in 100% of GRAS determinations made by food companies. In many cases, the same scientists served as paid consultants to the industry and as members of the panels certifying safety. The FDA does not systematically review these determinations and lacks the authority to require pre-market safety testing.
The result: the US food supply contains thousands of additives whose safety has never been independently verified. Several — including potassium bromate, BHA, BHT, and various artificial dyes — are banned or restricted in the EU, Canada, or other countries based on the same scientific evidence available to US regulators.
The Bottom Line
The food industry has followed the tobacco playbook for decades: fund favorable research, attack inconvenient science, exploit regulatory loopholes, and lobby against meaningful oversight. The result is a food supply where thousands of additives have never been independently tested for safety, where nutrition science has been corrupted by industry funding, and where the companies causing the most harm are the ones certifying their own products as safe.
The GRAS loophole remains open. The revolving door between the FDA and the food industry continues to spin. And the dietary guidelines that shape what 330 million Americans eat are still influenced by the same corporations that profit from selling ultra-processed food. Until the fundamental conflicts of interest in food safety regulation are addressed, the American public will continue to be the unwitting subjects of an uncontrolled experiment.
Primary Sources3 cited
UCSF Sugar Industry Documents
Internal sugar industry documents discovered at Harvard showing payments to manipulate research.
JAMA Internal Medicine GRAS Study
Study documenting conflicts of interest in food additive safety determinations.
FDA GRAS Notifications Database
FDA's database of voluntary GRAS notifications from food companies.
Connected Topics
More in HEALTH & PHARMA
Continue investigating related topics in this category
The Sackler family's Purdue Pharma deliberately misrepresented OxyContin's addiction risk, fueling an epidemic that has killed over 600,000 Americans. Internal documents show they knew.
The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act granted manufacturers legal immunity. A dedicated vaccine court has paid over $4.7 billion in claims. The debate over transparency and safety testing continues.
The US Public Health Service's Tuskegee Syphilis Study deliberately denied 399 Black men with syphilis effective treatment for 40 years. It was not the only US government human experimentation program — similar programs targeted prisoners, disabled people, Indigenous communities, and soldiers.
From Flint's lead crisis to Camp Lejeune's toxic water to PFAS 'forever chemicals' found in 98% of Americans' blood — water contamination cover-ups span decades and affect millions.